b Barry
on

 

It appears to me that rules CT0178 and CT0179 have been reversed in the v1.5 OpenCDISC Validator SDTM v3.1.3 configuration file .  I've attached a file to show you better what I'm trying to explain.  In the first image, I have a screenshot of the quarterly SDTM terminology QS-FT file.  The code C102408, codelist codes: CT101815 & CT101816 refer to the "QS-Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status" TEST CODE & TEST NAME respectively.  In the second screenshot, I show the OpenCDISC report, rule description tab, rules CT0178 and CT0179.  Rules CT0178 says that it refers to the TEST CODE (C101816) and rule CT0179 says that it refers to the TEST NAME (C101815).  However, based on the contents in the first screenshot, rule CT0178 should refer to the TEST NAME (C101815) and rule CT0179 should refer to the TEST CODE (C101816).  This makes me think they are reversed.

Forums: SDTM

s Sergiy
on April 8, 2015

Hi Barry, 

The problem is due to inconsistency in different versions of CDISC Control Terminology.

Foe example, originally C101815 codelist code was assigned to "Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status Test Name". However in 2013-12 it was changed to "Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status Test Code".

See similar forum threads: 

http://www.opencdisc.org/forum/ct0169-ct0170-error-opencdisc-qstestcd-and-qstest-are-not-ct-bars

http://www.opencdisc.org/forum/bug-config-sdtm-32xml

Kind Regards, 

Sergiy

 

 

Want a demo?

Let’s Talk.

We're eager to share and ready to listen.

Cookie Policy

Pinnacle 21 uses cookies to make our site easier for you to use. By continuing to use this website, you agree to our use of cookies. For more info visit our Privacy Policy.