ADaM

Description

Technical support questions about ADaM standard and validation rules

August 21, 2011
Hi... Rule AD0011 may not be working. It's flagging every 0/N ITTFL flag in my file, but they are all OK. My file has ITTFN = 0 if and only if ITTFL = N. Here's what the rule is printing: Variables = ITTFN, ITTFL Values = 0, N Rule ID = AD0011 Message = *FL = N and *FN != 0 The Values= list shows that the values are 0 and N, but the message is saying the flag is N but the value is NOT 0. No other messages are being generated for the flag variables. Thanks, Karen
Read More
March 24, 2011

HI,

I have a question. During the check it comes out that the variable TRTAG1 should be presented (e.g. ADLB). It is not clear to me, why this variable should be available. It is a parallel arm design and in ADLB following treatment variables are available: TRTA, TRTP. According to the guideline:

Read More
March 16, 2011

I have an ADaM define plus about 20 ADaM datasets including an ADSL.  What is needed to get rid of this rule:  skip_AD0053.

Prompt attention to this request would be appreciated...

Thanks,

-Don Hurst

 

 

 

Read More
March 3, 2011

Hi *,

both rules should not be counted as errors. Both variables are conditional and only required in designs with multiple treatments. 

See page 17, ADaM IG:

Read More
March 3, 2011

Hi *,

I have a question regarding the rules AD0129 - AD0130, AD0149 - AD0150. I got some errors, for e.g. ADLB, where the numerical value is not the same as the character value within the parameter. But for some parameters from e.g. URINALYSIS, numerical values are not possible.

It is stated in the guideline on page 27:

Read More
February 4, 2011

This check "When CRITy (Analysis Criterion) is populated, it's corresponding Analysis Criterion Y Flag must be populated" should be changed. Missing values are allowed if the result is missing and the Example 2 was used (see "CDISC ADaM Implementation Guide Version 1.0", page 77, Table 4.7.1.2). Please update this check.

Best regards,
Matthias

Read More
February 4, 2011

Hello,
The rule AD1008 checks for null values in required variables. Many ERRORS are printed due to missing values in TRTP where visit is SCREENING. At this time point I can't assign a planned treatment. Also in the documentation (CDISC ADaM Implementation Guide Version 1.0, page 51) an example displays missing values.
Please update this check.
Best regards,
Matthias

Read More
February 3, 2011

Which SAS format fullfill the check AD0043? (date/time format = YYYYMMDDHH:MM:SS.SS. or YYMMDD10HH:MM:SS.SS)

Read More
January 25, 2011

Hi everyone,

ADaM Validation is finally here! The newly released OpenCDISC Validator v1.2 now includes an ADaM validation rules configuration that was implemented based on the validation checks published by CDISC ADaM team available at http://www.cdisc.org/adam.

For a complete listing of ADaM validation rules supported by OpenCDISC please refer to http://www.opencdisc.org/projects/validator/cdisc-adam-1.0-validation-rules.

Thanks,
Max

Read More
Subscribe to ADaM

Want a demo?

Let’s Talk.

We're eager to share and ready to listen.

Cookie Policy

Pinnacle 21 uses cookies to make our site easier for you to use. By continuing to use this website, you agree to our use of cookies. For more info visit our Privacy Policy.