Validation Rule Suggestions

Description

This is where folks can suggest additional rules for the Pinnacle 21 Validator.

June 23, 2018

Hi P21 Team,

May I know, if the validation rules have been updated for EC-EX Domain Derivation.
Or by when would these rules be available in the Enterprise Version at least.

 

Read More
June 30, 2017

This suggestion is a change to the following rule in the SEND 3.0 (FDA).xml rule set:

Read More
June 30, 2017

The validation rule as implemented in Pinnacle 21 is incomplete for the MI domain. It doesn’t appear to include “per Finding Result” in its validation test. These domains should have a single record with the same USUBJID, --SPEC, and --ORRES.

Read More
February 26, 2017

 

 

 

 

Read More
January 10, 2017

Currently, Pinnacle only checks for non-ASCII data in VLM fields (e.g –TEST, --TESTCD, --PARM, --PARMCD, QLABEL, QNAM). What is your opinion about extending the rule to check ALL data fields for non-ascii characters? Can this be implemented in community version?

Read More
April 28, 2016

Hey guys,

The Rules repository is down just when I was upadting the documentation to one of my tools.

I wanted to make the link between each of my checks and the OpenCDISC checks... Timing is a b****, :-).

When is this expected to be up again?

Best wishes,

Dirk

Read More
January 12, 2016

Pinnacle Community combines FDA rules FDAN014 and FDAN015, and assigns the lower severity of warning, where rule FDAN014 is listed as an ERROR by the FDA for the domains of TS, TX, and DM.

Pinnacle Community combines FDA rules FDAN018 and FDAN019, and assigns the lower severity of warning, where rule FDAN019 is listed as an ERROR by the FDA for the TS domain.

Pinnacle Community calls FDAN031 a Notice; the FDA rule set classifies it as a Warning.

Pinnacle Community calls FDAN055 a Notice; the FDA rule set classifies it as a Warning.

Read More
December 22, 2015

The tool warns about imputed values for these two variables.  When POOLID is used instead of USUBJID for FW records (which is very common), the tool doesn't find the RFSTDTC and thinks the value is, therefore, imputed. 

Read More
December 22, 2015

The message "EGSTRESC value not found in 'ECG Result' extensible codelist" needs to be refined so that it does not appear in the many instances when EGSTRESC is numeric.

Read More
November 27, 2015

Dear All,

I have some queries on the validation rule and they are mentioned below can you please look into it and provide your response.

1.If DSDY variable is added into SDTM.DS domain then OpenCDISC gives below warning. 

Domain Values OpenCDISC ID  Publisher ID Message                     

Read More
Subscribe to Validation Rule Suggestions

Want a demo?

Let’s Talk.

We're eager to share and ready to listen.

Cookie Policy

Pinnacle 21 uses cookies to make our site easier for you to use. By continuing to use this website, you agree to our use of cookies. For more info visit our Privacy Policy.