SDTM

Description

Technical support questions about SDTM standard and validation rules

June 14, 2021

The message for SD1358 is confusing.  It currently reads:  "ACTARMCD/ACTARM are populated but ARMNRS is not populated".  I think it should read something like:  "When ACTARMCD/ACTARM are NOT populated,  ARMNRS must be populated".

Read More
June 9, 2021

Hi,

Currently we notice that in EC domain when ECMOOD=SCHEDULED the timing variables ECSTDTC and ECENDTC are blank. As per SDTM IG when ECMOOD is scheduled both ECPRESP and ECOCCUR variables are null. As per recent pinnacle report this below rule triggered when ECOCCUR is null records. How are we going to handle in this case?

Read More
June 7, 2021

Hi, I have a question about SDTM in a clinical study divided into part.

For example, clinical study includes part1 and part2. And, CSR is made per part.

Therefore, SDTM will be created for each part. Then, is it ok if STUDYID is assigned the same?

 

Thank you in advance!

 

Best regards,

MinJi 

Read More
May 11, 2021

Hi, I have a question a case where protocol version and content are different.

In TS domain, the protocol contents differs according to the protocol version and the protocols are applied to the clinical trial.

If so. does the TS domain have to contain all protocol contents or just last version?

 

Thank you in advance!

 

Best regards,

MinJi

Read More
May 5, 2021

If we have a study that includes sub studies - then creating multiple NARMS in the Trial Summary might be convenient. However, the P21 throws an error that only one record of TSPARMCD = NARMS is possible. Should this be updated or do we need to include all sub-study arms into one record?

Read More
April 26, 2021

Hi,

We use a constant number (e.g. 99) for all unscheduled visits. The problem is when a subject has two unscheduled visits, those will be listed as separate rows in SV and check SD1060 (Duplicate VISITNUM) fires. Due to my understanding of SDTM it is allowed to have several unscheduled visits listed in SV for one subject.

CDISC SDTM IG 3.3, 4.4.5 Clinical Encounters and Visits

Read More
April 26, 2021

Hi Team!

Could you please explain the next confusing validation?

Read More
April 14, 2021

We have a patient who did not meet inclusion criteria but was randomized mistakenly, and we will treat the patient as "Screening Failure".

I understood that ARM variable in SDTM should consist of planned arm (assigned to through randomization).

For this case of SF patients who proceeded randomization mistakenly, which data (treatment group randomized vs. 'Screen Failure' vs. blank) should be filled in ARM variable?

Please consider that this case is not same with the case of patients who are randomized in treatment group but not treated.

 

Read More
April 8, 2021

Hi, I have a question about unit conversion from LBORRESU to LBSTRESU.

For example, CK-MB sample has original unit as U/L, but SI unit is μg/L.

I cannot find unit conversion rule from U/L to μg/L.

Therefore, we set LBSTRESU as 'μg/L.' and let LBSTRESC, LBSTRESN, LBSTNRHI, and LBSTNRLO values as null.

Could you please suggest any other idea?

Read More
April 6, 2021

Why are some versions of MED-RT/NDF-RT not available in the Pinnacle 21 community?
For example, referring to the NCI archive, there are 10 MED-RT/NDF-RTs registered in 2018, but only 6 could be selected in the Pinnacle 21 community.
Is there a  regulatory or Pinnacle's technical reason for this?

screen shot

Kind regards,
Takayuki

Read More
Subscribe to SDTM

Want a demo?

Let’s Talk.

We're eager to share and ready to listen.

Cookie Policy

Pinnacle 21 uses cookies to make our site easier for you to use. By continuing to use this website, you agree to our use of cookies. For more info visit our Privacy Policy.